Blockchain Auditing Standards
1 min read
Pronunciation
[blok-cheyn aw-di-ting stan-derdz]
Analogy
Like building codes that ensure structural safety and quality in construction.
Definition
Formalized frameworks and best practices for assessing the security, correctness, and compliance of blockchain systems and smart contracts.
Key Points Intro
Auditing standards define scope, methodology, and reporting for blockchain security reviews.
Key Points
Scope definition: On-chain code, off-chain integrations, and governance processes.
Methodology: Combines manual review, automated analysis, and formal verification.
Reporting: Standardized severity ratings (e.g., CVSS) and remediation guidance.
Compliance: Aligns with ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2, and industry‑specific regulations.
Example
Technical Deep Dive
Standards prescribe use of static analysis (Slither), symbolic execution (MythX), fuzzing (Echidna), and formal methods (Coq, Isabelle). They require test coverage thresholds, code style checks, and multi‑party peer reviews. Deliverables include threat models, sequence diagrams, and remediation roadmaps.
Security Warning
Relying solely on checklists can miss complex logic flaws; combine standards with bespoke threat modelling.
Caveat
Standards evolve rapidly; auditors must stay current with both specifications and emerging attack vectors.
Blockchain Auditing Standards - Related Articles
No related articles for this term.