Clear DefinitionsOn-chain Referenda
1 min read
Pronunciation
[on-cheyn ref-uh-ren-duh]
Analogy
On-chain referenda are like official government elections or ballot initiatives conducted entirely on a transparent, auditable digital platform (the blockchain). Eligible voters (token holders) cast their ballots, the votes are automatically tallied, and if a proposal wins, the new law or action (e.g., a protocol upgrade) can be automatically put into effect.
Definition
A formal voting process within an on-chain governance system where token holders vote directly on specific proposals or questions. The results of these referenda are recorded on the blockchain and can automatically trigger changes or actions if the proposal passes.
Key Points Intro
On-chain referenda enable token holders to directly vote on proposals, with results being binding and potentially auto-executing.
Key Points
A formal voting mechanism used in on-chain governance.
Token holders vote on specific proposals (e.g., protocol upgrades, parameter changes, fund allocations).
Votes and results are recorded immutably on the blockchain.
Successful referenda can trigger smart contract executions to implement changes.
Example
Polkadot's governance system uses on-chain referenda. Any DOT holder can propose a referendum, or it can be proposed by the Polkadot Council. DOT holders then vote on these referenda. If a referendum passes (e.g., to fund a treasury proposal or schedule a runtime upgrade), the outcome is enacted automatically by the protocol.
Technical Deep Dive
On-chain referenda are managed by governance smart contracts. These contracts define the lifecycle of a proposal: submission, voting period, tallying criteria (e.g., simple majority, quorum requirements), and enactment. Token holders interact with these contracts to cast their votes, often weighted by the number of tokens they hold or have staked. The smart contract logic ensures that only valid votes are counted and that the outcome is enforced according to the predefined rules. This often involves mechanisms for time-locking changes before execution.
Security Warning
Voter apathy and low participation can be challenges for on-chain referenda, potentially allowing well-funded minorities to influence outcomes. Ensure you understand the proposal's implications before voting. The security of the governance contracts themselves is critical.
Caveat
The parameters for referenda (e.g., quorum levels, turnout requirements, proposal thresholds) need to be carefully calibrated to balance efficiency with security and representation. Complex proposals might be difficult for all token holders to fully understand, leading to reliance on expert opinions or delegates.
On-chain Referenda - Related Articles
No related articles for this term.