Cross-Consensus Messaging
1 min read
Pronunciation
[kraws-kon-sen-suhs mes-ij-ing]
Analogy
Like translators enabling dialogue between speakers of different languages with guaranteed fidelity.
Definition
Key Points Intro
Cross‑consensus messaging bridges networks with disparate finality and security models.
Key Points
Proof translation: Converts PoW headers to BFT‑verifiable commits.
Finality mapping: Aligns probabilistic and deterministic finality guarantees.
Message handlers: Contracts adapt messages to local consensus rules.
Sequencing: Orders cross‑consensus events to prevent forks.
Example
Technical Deep Dive
Bridge modules implement SPV verification (Merkle proofs, difficulty checks) and map to BFT commits via on‑chain finality gadgets. Validators vote on PoW-derived messages, with checkpoint contracts anchoring headers at epochs.
Security Warning
Weak mapping of finality can allow reorg attacks; require conservative confirmation thresholds.
Caveat
Mismatch in latency and confirmation time can slow cross‑consensus operations.
Cross-Consensus Messaging - Related Articles
No related articles for this term.