Proof-of-Stake
Pronunciation
[proof uhv steyk]
Analogy
Imagine a shareholder meeting where voting power is proportional to the number of shares owned. In Proof-of-Stake, individuals who 'stake' more of the network's currency have a higher chance of being chosen to validate transactions and create new blocks. If they try to cheat, they risk losing their staked shares, making them act honestly.
Definition
Key Points Intro
PoS is an alternative to PoW that is generally more energy-efficient and can offer different scalability and governance properties.
Key Points
Validators lock up a certain amount of cryptocurrency (their 'stake') to participate in consensus.
Block creators are typically chosen pseudo-randomly, with higher stakes increasing the chances of selection.
Validators earn transaction fees and sometimes block rewards for their participation.
Malicious behavior (e.g., double-signing, validating fraudulent transactions) can result in 'slashing,' where a portion of the validator's stake is forfeited.
Generally considered more energy-efficient than PoW.
Example
Technical Deep Dive
There are many variations of PoS. Some involve random selection of validators based on stake size and age (e.g., 'coin age'). Others use more complex algorithms involving committees or voting rounds. Key challenges in PoS design include preventing 'nothing-at-stake' problems (where validators have no disincentive to vote on multiple conflicting chains) and ensuring fair validator selection. Slashing mechanisms are crucial for security, creating an economic disincentive for attacks.
Security Warning
Proof-of-Stake - Related Articles
No related articles for this term.