Clear DefinitionsSimulation Preview UX
2 min read
Pronunciation
[sim-yuh-ley-shuhn pree-vyoo yoo-eks]
Analogy
Think of Simulation Preview UX like a virtual fitting room for blockchain transactions. Just as a virtual fitting room lets you see how clothes would look on you before purchasing—showing how different pieces work together and alerting you to potential fit issues without requiring you to buy anything—transaction simulation shows you exactly what will happen when your transaction executes, revealing how your balances will change, what assets you'll receive, and any potential errors, all before you spend gas on an actual transaction. Both help you make informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes by providing a consequence-free preview of the end result.
Definition
A user experience pattern that shows users the predicted outcome of blockchain transactions before they're submitted to the network. Simulation Preview UX executes read-only simulations of transactions against the current blockchain state to display expected results, potential errors, and side effects, helping users understand complex contract interactions and avoid costly mistakes before committing to irreversible operations.
Key Points Intro
Simulation Preview UX enhances blockchain interfaces through several key mechanisms that increase transparency and reduce transaction risks.
Key Points
State preview: Shows expected account balances, token holdings, and contract states after transaction execution.
Error detection: Identifies potential transaction failures before they occur, saving users from wasted gas fees.
Side effect visibility: Reveals indirect consequences of transactions like token approvals, delegate changes, or governance effects.
Gas optimization: Often provides estimates of gas usage and suggestions for optimizing transaction parameters.
Example
When a user attempted a complex DeFi operation to leverage their ETH position on Aave, supply the borrowed USDC to Compound, and stake the resulting tokens for rewards, the Instadapp interface implemented Simulation Preview UX. Before submitting the transaction, the user saw a comprehensive breakdown showing they would deposit 5 ETH, borrow 7,500 USDC, supply this to Compound earning 3.2% APY, and receive 7,450 cUSDC tokens. The simulation also revealed an unexpected issue: the transaction would fail because it required approving the Compound contract to access their USDC, which wasn't included in the transaction. The interface automatically offered to add this approval step, preventing a guaranteed transaction failure that would have wasted $25 in gas fees.
Technical Deep Dive
Simulation Preview UX implementations typically use forked blockchain environments or specialized simulation nodes that execute transactions against a copy of the current blockchain state without broadcasting them to the network. Advanced implementations employ trace-based simulation that captures and analyzes the complete execution trace, including all contract calls, state changes, and events emitted during execution. This technical approach typically involves three key components: transaction building (constructing the raw transaction with all necessary parameters), simulation execution (running the transaction against a forked chain state), and result processing (parsing execution traces to extract relevant information for display). Leading implementations use techniques like speculative execution to simulate multiple potential transaction paths, flagging race condition risks where market movements could affect outcomes. The user interface layer transforms these technical results into intuitive visualizations, often using before/after comparisons, flow diagrams showing asset movements between contracts, and color-coded indicators for balance changes. Sophisticated systems may implement differential privacy techniques to prevent frontrunning by obscuring exact transaction parameters while still providing meaningful previews.
Security Warning
While simulation previews can identify many potential issues, they cannot guarantee identical execution results when the actual transaction is processed. Market conditions, mempool transactions, or state changes occurring between simulation and execution can alter outcomes. Never rely solely on simulations for high-value transactions, and always implement additional safeguards like slippage protection and maximum gas limits.
Caveat
Simulation Preview UX faces significant technical limitations when dealing with highly volatile or concurrent systems. Simulations represent a point-in-time preview that may become inaccurate if blockchain state changes significantly before the transaction is confirmed. Many implementations struggle with simulating complex multi-contract interactions that depend on external oracles or time-sensitive data. Additionally, accurate simulations require substantial computational resources, creating challenges for decentralized interfaces and potentially introducing centralization vectors if users rely on centralized simulation services.
Simulation Preview UX - Related Articles
No related articles for this term.