Front‑Running Protection (e.g. private mempools)
1 min read
Pronunciation
[front-ruh-ning pruh-tek-shun]
Analogy
Like sending a sealed envelope to the judge instead of reading your plea aloud in court, so no one can act on its contents prematurely.
Definition
Mechanisms designed to prevent traders or bots from seeing pending transactions in the public mempool and inserting their own orders ahead of them. Examples include private mempools, commit‑reveal schemes, and transaction encryption.
Key Points Intro
Front‑running protection hides transaction details until inclusion or uses cryptographic commitment to thwart unfair ordering.
Key Points
Private mempools: Transactions routed through trusted relays.
Commit‑reveal: Submit hash of transaction, reveal details later.
Threshold encryption: Encrypt tx payload until block seal.
Decentralized sequencers: Prevent single‑party ordering control.
Example
A DEX integrates MEV‑Shield so users’ swaps go through a private relay, preventing bots from seeing and sandwiching them.
Technical Deep Dive
Private mempool relay nodes accept signed envelopes, simulate MEV, and only broadcast bundles to validators. Commit‑reveal contracts require `commit(hash)` on chain, then `reveal(tx, salt)` in subsequent phase to execute.
Security Warning
Reliance on relay operators introduces trust assumptions; diversify relays and audit code.
Caveat
Commit‑reveal increases latency and UX complexity; balance protection with usability.
Front‑Running Protection (e.g. private mempools) - Related Articles
No related articles for this term.