Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Glossary

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

  • search-icon Clear Definitions
  • search-icon Practical
  • search-icon Technical
  • search-icon Related Terms

Lazy Reveal

2 min read
Pronunciation
[ˈleɪ-zi rɪ-ˈviːl]
Analogy
Think of lazy reveal as a sealed trading card pack. When you purchase the pack (mint the NFT), you know you're getting cards from a specific collection, but the exact cards inside remain hidden until you open it (the reveal). This creates anticipation and ensures fairness, as buyers can't cherry-pick the rarest cards by seeing through the packaging—everyone has the same chance of getting valuable cards regardless of when they make their purchase.
Definition
A technique used in NFT collections where the actual visual content and attributes of tokens are initially hidden and only revealed after the mint has completed. Lazy reveal uses encrypted or placeholder metadata during the minting phase, with the true artwork and traits disclosed in a subsequent reveal transaction, adding an element of surprise while preventing selective minting based on rarity.
Key Points Intro
Lazy reveal mechanisms serve important functions in NFT collection launches.
Key Points

Fairness enforcement: Prevents buyers from selectively minting only the rarest or most valuable items in a collection.

Engagement amplification: Creates a two-stage experience that builds community anticipation and excitement around the reveal event.

Gas optimization: Allows for simpler initial metadata that can be updated once rather than setting complex data during high-gas mint periods.

Launch flexibility: Enables creators to finalize artwork and attributes after gauging mint success and community feedback.

Example
The Quantum Creatures NFT project launches with 10,000 tokens featuring placeholder images of mystery eggs. Collectors mint these tokens for 0.08 ETH each without knowing which specific creature they'll receive. Three days after the mint sells out, the project team executes the reveal transaction that updates the metadata for all tokens simultaneously. Each placeholder egg transforms into one of 200 different creature designs with varying attributes and rarity scores. The community experiences a shared moment of discovery as collectors rush to see which creatures they received, leading to immediate secondary market activity as rare specimens are identified and valued accordingly.
Technical Deep Dive
Lazy reveal implementations typically use one of three technical approaches. The most common is the provenance hash method, where creators generate all possible token images and metadata in advance, concatenate their hashes in a specific order, and publish the root hash of this sequence before minting begins. During the mint, tokens reference a placeholder image. At reveal time, the full mapping of token IDs to their positions in the predetermined sequence is published, typically using a blockhash as a random seed. A second approach uses on-chain encrypted metadata, where actual token data is stored encrypted on-chain during minting, with the decryption key published at reveal time. The third method employs updatable URI patterns in the contract, initially pointing to placeholder content with a contract-level function to update the base URI for all tokens simultaneously. For security, most implementations ensure the reveal mechanism is either fully deterministic (using a commitment scheme) or uses verifiable randomness sources like Chainlink VRF to prevent manipulation. Advanced implementations may employ zero-knowledge proofs to demonstrate that the revealed collection contains the originally promised distribution of traits without revealing specific mappings beforehand.
Security Warning
Verify that projects using lazy reveal publish a provenance hash or similar commitment before minting starts. Without this, developers could manipulate the reveal to assign rare traits to specific wallets. Also confirm that the randomization source for distribution is verifiable and not controllable by the project team.
Caveat
Lazy reveals introduce potential trust issues, as buyers must rely on project developers to honestly execute the reveal process without manipulation. Technical implementations vary widely in security, from truly trustless approaches using verified random functions to completely centralized reveals. Additionally, if a project fails to sell out, developers may delay reveals indefinitely or abandon the project before revealing, leaving buyers with permanent placeholder content. The reveal process itself can also lead to significant disappointment and community backlash if the revealed artwork or trait distribution doesn't meet expectations.

Lazy Reveal - Related Articles

No related articles for this term.